More Horde! A Review of Skytear Horde: Monoliths (Solo and Cooperative Only).

We’ve been sitting on this review for a few weeks, but since the new Skytear Horde Campaigns is currently crowdfunding, we thought it would make sense to put this out now instead of later!

IMG_4963

Skytear Horde: Monoliths is a standalone expansion for the Skytear Horde game system: this is the first expansion.  This is a tower defense game!  This game system is an odd duck for player counts: it is a solo game (1-Player), cooperative (2-Player), or competitive (2 or 3-Player) tower defense game.  The game type is closely tied to the player count!  We will only be discussing only the solo and cooperative gameplay today.  

IMG_4956

Skytear Horde: Monoliths was on Gamefound back in May 2023 and delivered to my house in May 2024. They said it would take a year to deliver and they weren’t wrong!

IMG_4961

We reviewed the original Skytear Horde back in March 2023: See our review here.  We liked the original Skytear Horde enough to make our Top 10 Solo Board and Card Games of 2024, which is why we picked up the expansion! 

Let’s take a look at this standalone expansion!

Unboxing

IMG_4965

This is a smallish box: see the Coke can above for scale.

IMG_4967

The original game (which had the deluxe box) is a little bit bigger.

IMG_4985

This is mostly a card game: although there are some punchouts and a rulebook, this is an expansion with 250 new cards.

IMG_4987

There are 3 new Alliance Decks: Green, Red, and Blue (see above).  Recall that the solo and 2-Player games have each player take an Alliance deck: they are 40 cards of goodness per deck (for 120 cards of Alliance decks).

IMG_4993

The good guys are protecting their Castle: they choose one of 6 new Castles at the start of the game (see above).

IMG_4988

IMG_5021

Of course, there has to be a big bad for the players to fight: the expansion comes with 3 new Epic Monsters! See some above.

IMG_5001

There are three new Horde decks (87 cards total): see above.  Recall that the Horde decks are the “Bad News” decks that summon bad guys monsters that you have to fight!!  The type is notated in the upper right, with the difficulty marked on the very bottom: each deck can be configured to be harder or easier based on the difficulty icon on the bottom.

IMG_4991

There are a set of portals that control the summoning rate of the Horde: see above.  There are a different set of Portals for solo, co-op, and competitive modes.

IMG_4994

There’s some new cards (Roots and Troops) …

IMG_4997

Altogether, the new cards are gorgeous with art consistent from the original game.  

IMG_5015

There are also some tokens, of which you will need some! 

IMG_5035

I have the original deluxe version of the original game, which comes with the playmat AND some plastic tokens.  Even if you have the plastic tokens from the original game, you still want some of the tokens from the expansion to play!

IMG_5040

Basically, the temporary tokens (with the white middle) are really necessary to track temporary statuses. I found this out the hard way (during my first game) that you really do need these temporary status tokens.

IMG_4998

Overall, the expansion looks good.

Rulebook

IMG_4968

This new rulebook is 24 pages.  This is important because the original rulebook was only 16 pages: we’ll see why this is important in a second.

IMG_4969

There is mention of a video for learning the game on the cover: we prefer learning from the rulebook (so we can lookup things easier later).  But, it’s good to know there is an official video.

IMG_4970

Skytear Horde: Monoliths gets an A on the The Chair Test: I can see the rulebook on the chair next to me, the rulebook stays open, and the font is pretty readable.  Weirdly, there seems to be a lot of white space: I would have preferred a bigger font and less white space?  The white space choice bothered me. Otherwise, it does very well on The Chair Test.

IMG_4971

The Components page is very good at listing all the cards and pointing out features of each set of cards.  See above.  I spent a decent amount of time on this page correlating the cards to the Components page: I feel it’s important to touch and see all the components as a step towards understanding the game. 

It’s a good Components page.  The token discussion was quite nice (on the opposite page) as well.  

IMG_4972

The set-up is quite good too: See above. Interspersed in the text, there’s even suggestions for monsters and characters and bad guys for your first game!  Thanks Skytear Horde: Monoliths!  My first game(s) were easy to set-up!

IMG_4973

The rest of the rulebook is pretty good too.  

IMG_4975

I ended up keeping pages 12-16 open and active as I played: it just seemed easier to help me keep track of where I was in the game.

IMG_4971

This was a pretty good rulebook, but not great.  Recall, from our review of the original Skytear Horde that we felt the rulebook could have been a little better.  They have definitely evolved the rulebook: it’s better, more readable (especially for the first-timer or virtual first-timer), but it still doesn’t have lots of examples or FAQs or edge case discriminators.

In both one and two-player game, a bunch of questions came up as we played, and we struggled to find some edge cases (Can we attach an item to a compatriot or only ourselves?  If we “kill” a minion, but something heals it, does it reactivate to Pillage? How does a Castle get minions if it can’t engage?).   I am sure there is something online (the designer seems very active in the BGG forums), but I wish there had been a little more in the rulebook.

IMG_4970

There’s a table of Contents (yay … see above), no Index (boo), but there is a Glossary (yay … see below)!

IMG_4981

This was a pretty good rulebook.  I want more edge case rulings or a FAQ, and the white space bugs me (but I am pretty sure that is a me thing).  In general, the rulebook has evolved for the better and I was able to jump in pretty quickly.

Gameplay

IMG_4966

The gameplay of Skytear Horde: Monoliths is pretty much the same as the original game, but with new ideas peppered in (Troops, temporary armor/attack, new Hordes, new Alliances, etc).  If you liked the base game and just want more, this is a perfect expansion.

IMG_5050

I ended up playing with the plastic tokens and game mat from the original game, but I didn’t need them: they just made the game spiffier.  You can play the whole thing by itself without needing the original game.

IMG_5025

That’s pretty much what I did: I wanted to see all the new content, so I only played with new stuff!! Monoliths!

IMG_4976

The rulebook (by being a very nice guide) has made the gameplay “seem” smoother in the new game, even if it’s just a by-product of my imagination.  

Nothing in the expansion is ground-breaking, mind-altering, or life-changing.  It fits in the basic flow of the game easily and just adds more stuff.

Solo Mode

IMG_4959

So, Skytear Horde: Monliths follows Saunders’ Law and there is a viable solo mode.  In fact, I almost feel like this is a solo game first, and then the cooperative and competitive modes are afterthoughts … well-developed afterthoughts, but not the primary way to play.

IMG_4978

As proof, the cooperative mode is listed as an afterthought AFTER the solo play is explained ..

IMG_4977

… and the competitive mode is listed after the co-op and competitive modes. See pages from the rulebook above.

IMG_5028

I really do like that the solo mode is a pure solo mode, where the solo player takes control of just one Alliance deck!  Solo is so easy to jump into; I picked the blue Alliance deck (above) and was able to start playing pretty quickly!

IMG_5038

My first solo game went really well, but I realized I was cheating a lot!  Not on purpose, but I just kept missing a lot of nuances and edge cases (like I said, I wish the rules were a little better on edge cases!)

IMG_5180

Once I got a few more games under my belt, the solo game became a much more interesting puzzle!  See above as I just barely win with 1 Alliance card (just 1!) after defeating the Epic Bad Guy!  I just barely won and it was glorious!

IMG_5178

It took me about 3 games to feel like I got all the nuances.  The first few learning games were fun, but I think you need a few games under your belt before the game starts firing on all cylinders.

IMG_5177

Playing Skytear Horde: Monloiths solo reminds me why Skytear Horde originally made my Top 10 Solo Board and Card Games of 2023! This is a fun puzzle! And Monoliths is more of the same!

Cooperative Game

IMG_5043

This time around, I was able to get the 2-Player cooperative mode played … you might recall in our review of the original Skytear Horde, I never was able to get my friends interested in playing!  Luckily, I have been doing a lot more 2-Player co-ops lately, so I was able to get both Sam and Teresa interested in playing!

IMG_5045

Unfortunately, these games didn’t go quite as smoothly.

IMG_5048

Although it seems a natural extension of the solo mode, as each co-op player takes an Alliance deck, the game didn’t seem to play as smoothly.

IMG_5043

It seemed like we were playing a little more multi-player solo than really cooperating.  Sure, we needed to discuss what monsters to engage, but there didn’t seem to be as much cooperation as I had hoped.  

One thing that seemed to really keep us down was that the Mana allocation was lesser (it’s only +3 per round) for two players.  It felt like it was harder to get things going in a 2-Player game because of the Mana restriction … and that was more frustrating.

IMG_5050

We also had some bad luck, even with the Mulligan in set-up rules.

I feel like it would have been nice to have a few more cooperative mechanisms:

  • share Mana?  The small portions of Mana might have felt less debilitating if we could apportion the Mana?  Say “the team” gets 7 Mana per turn to apportion as they wish, instead of 3 each?  This can help mitigate bad card draws.
  • share Attachment? At the time we played, it was unclear whether Attachments could go to the other player. I think, after some hunting through some rules, that Attachments can go to either player.  This needs to be stated much more explicitly!
  • share cards?  Not necessarily “pool cards”, but it might have been nice to have a mechanism to share cards better?   Maybe each turn players could swap one card?

I wanted more cooperation in my cooperative game.  Don’t get me wrong, the cooperative game works, but it felt more like multi-player solo.  That maybe a good thing for some people: a lot of people don’t like it when the Alpha Player (see our discussion of Alpha Player Syndrome here) tells them what to do!  The cooperative mode definitely avoids some of the Alpha Player pitfalls, but at the cost of some cooperation. Caveat Emptor: this may be the perfect cooperative mode for you and your friend! I just wanted more cooperation.

IMG_5042

The cooperative mode just wasn’t quite as smooth as the solo mode.

What I Liked

IMG_5039

I like Skytear Horde!  The Monoliths expansion gives me more of the same … in a good way!

IMG_5026

The card art is pretty phenomenal.  Even when we were having a bad cooperative game, my friend Teresa said “I really enjoyed the cards and art“.

IMG_4995

Speaking of the cards, they are well-notated, easy to read, and usually very clear. 

IMG_5024

I really love the solo mode.

What I Didn’t Like

IMG_5047

Even with the Mulligans during set-up, sometimes you can get completely screwed by a bad card draw.  We had to take a Pillage of 11 cards (like more than 1/4 of our deck) during the first turn because we could get nothing going!  I am pretty sure that’s why we had such a bad first cooperative game, but there’s not much you can do to mitigate the randomness of some card draws …

IMG_5037

It would be nice, for example, to have a choice of two cards when you draw (when you kill a monster, you get to draw a card).  Currently, there is no mitigation of the luck-of-the-draw: you just get the card you get.   It might be nice if we got to choose the card we got?

IMG_4968

The rulebook needs a FAQ or some more edge cases description.

Conclusion

IMG_5036

I like Skytear Horde and I like Skytear Horde: Monoliths.  It’s great that Monoliths is a standalone expansion (so I can just play the new stuff) or an addition (so I combine old stuff and new stuff).   There’s nothing ground-breaking here: just more of the same, in a good way! If you like Skytear Horde, you’ll like Skytear Horde: Monoliths!

IMG_5050

I think I prefer Skytear Hordes: Monoliths as a solo game.  The cooperative mode is pretty good, and maybe perfect for you if you want to avoid the Alpha Player in your games (at the cost of some cooperation).

IMG_5024

This is a good game with a good production: we recommend it wholeheartedly for the solo player, and a little cautiously to the cooperative players.  Hopefully our review will help you figure out if this is something you would like.

A Review of Slay The Spire (The Board Game) From Someone Who Doesn’t Like Rogue-like Games And Has Never Played The Video Game!

IMG_4652

Rogue

When I was an undergrad at college, a lot of my friends played a game called Rogue on the vt100 computer terminals.

vt100rogue

It was a little dungeon crawler that my friends spent HOURS and HOURS playing.

It’s a Dungeon Crawler? Fun!  Do you save you characters very often?
“Uh, … no.  You just play until you die.  You don’t save characters.”
I’m out!”

And that was pretty much where I learned to dislike Rogue-like games.  If I play a dungeon crawler spending hours leveling up my character, I want to save it!  Part of the fun, for me at least, is returning to my character that I’ve invested in.  I have no desire to play a formless character that just dies.

To be fair, my opinion has not aged well.  I have been informed by many people that Rogue-like games have some saving capability.  Still, my malformed opinion has persisted through the years.

Slay The Spire

IMG_4653

Because of my prejudice against Rogue-like games, I have never played the original Video game Splay The Spire.  I must admit, though, that I was intrigued by Slay The Spire (a cooperative deck-building game) when it appeared on Kickstarter back in November 2022.   The original Slay The Spire video game was really only a solo game … maybe the transition to cooperative board game would make it something more up my alley?

IMG_4657

This arrived at my house in May 2023 (see above); it had promised delivery in Dec 2023, so it’s about 5 months late.  In the world of Kickstarter, 5 months late is not bad.

IMG_4656

This is a cooperative board game for 1-4 players, Ages 12+, with only 60-90 minutes per Act!  I was intrigued!  To be fair, a lot of my friends seemed “excited” to play this game, so I freely admit that their enthusiasm was contagious.  

Let’s take a look!

Unboxing

IMG_4659

This is a pretty tall box (see Coke can above for perspective), but  it’s about the same form factor (in length and width) as a Ticket To Ride size box.

IMG_4661

The top of the box has the rulebook and Upgrades and Items guide.

IMG_4665

Don’t be too impressed by this Upgrades and Items guide: all it does is show all the cards!  It has no disambiguating text!

IMG_4668

There is a very nice boxing/unboxing guide for putting this together and taking this apart. See above.

IMG_4680

Are you like me as one of the few people and didn’t know that Slay The Spire Video Game was a deck-building game? Well, the board game is also a deck-building game!  As a deck-building game, this game comes with SO MANY cards!  See above and below. And its own sleeves!  For more discussion of Cooperative deck-builders like this, check out our Top 10 Cooperative Deck-Building Games!

IMG_4721

I have been informed that the cards and art look exactly like the Video Game.

IMG_4687

And there are a ton of cards and boards!  See above!  This game looks really fantastic! See above!

And it looks like the Video Game.

IMG_4731

I want to be 100% clear about this: this production is amazing!  It’s a deck-building game that comes with sleeves!  The tokens come in an easy-to-use tray! The cards can all be stored very easily in the box!   The box is easy to repack!   They really knocked it out of the park on the production of this game!

Gameplay

IMG_4673

Each player chooses one of 4 characters to play: see the characters above. I have been informed by players of the Slay The Spire Video Game that these are straight out of the Video Game!

IMG_4688

Each player also takes the corresponding figurine: these will be used to notate which “row” you will be fighting in; we’ll describe that more below.

IMG_4708

Each player has their own deck of cards to start with: each deck is a little different and really represents a different play style.  Simplifying a little too much: the blue deck is defensive, the red deck is offensive, and the green deck is all about poison.  

IMG_4774

Players together choose a “path” to take to get to the final Bad Guy (at the top of the board above). These decisions can have you fight a monster, summon the merchant, build a fire (“smith” or heal: I learned the word “smith” from one of the Slay The Spire Video Game friends), fight Epic monsters, or take events. I was informed these choices were very reminiscent of things that happen in the Video Game.

IMG_4814

When you fight a monster, each row next to a character gets some monster(s) from the Encounter Deck! See above as “the red guy” fights a Shelled Parasite. (I don’t know “the red guy’s” name because it is not notated on his board). Note that the monster has some hit points (left and right of card), and some icons: those icons tell you what the monster does when it attacks you.

IMG_4759

As a card game, you play cards to attack your monster and/or defend yourself!! Shields up your defense (blue icons above), and swords up your attack (red swords above). You only have a limited amount of energy per turn to spend to play a card (usually 3 energy worth), so that limits which cards you can play (the energy cost is in the upper left corner).

You draw up to 5 cards every turn, and discard all when you are done. That feels very much like a deck-builder.

IMG_4772

Typically after you win a battle with a monster, you can add an upgraded card to your deck: you deal 3 and choose 1 (apparently, just like the Video Game). See an example draw above.

IMG_4844

See above as some of my cards have a GREEN text for the title?  This means that I was able upgrade the card BY FLIPPING IT OVER!  Each card has two sides, a normal side and an upgraded side: you can “Smith” to turn the card over and therefore improve it!!  This is a really neat mechanic in a deck-building … and rare! I can’t think of another deck-builder that does this!

IMG_4795

You can also occasionally get new additions from a rare deck (see yellow outline): these are much better cards!

IMG_4752

To be clear, each character has their OWN upgrade deck to draw from and their OWN rares deck to draw from!  See above: the red guy has a starter cards (grey outline), upgrade deck (black outline), and rares deck (yellow outline).  This makes each character very distinct as they are built to upgrade a specific way.  Like we said earlier, the red guy’s decks concentrate on attacks, blue guy’s deck concentrate on defense, and green guy’s decks concentrate on poison.  

IMG_4776

You occasionally can buy stuff from the passing merchant, including potions or treasures and even random cards. This even includes a way to cull cards: we call this The Andrew rule: A deck-building game MUST have a fairly systematic way to cull cards. Luckily, Andrew would (and does) like this game because he can cull cards.

IMG_4807

Along the way, there are all sorts of other cards that come out: Events, Monsters, Potions, Treasures, Epic Treasures, and deck-cloggers (Daze and fire).  I have been told this is just like the video game!

IMG_4819

But of course, the purpose of all this is to take down the Big Bad Monster at the top!  See above as I fight the Big Bad Bronze Automaton and a Bronze Orb! 

Like many cooperative games, all players win together when they defeat the Big Bad, or they lose if any of them dies! So, it’s in everyone’s best interest to cooperate and keep each other alive!

The Rulebook

IMG_4661

 I need to talk about the rulebook.  It’s okay, but not great. It really should have been better given how great the production of the rest of this game.

IMG_4689 (1)

It does well on The Chair Test: it only droops over  the edges a little, the font is big and readable, and the book stays open on the chair next to me so I can see the rules without taking up precious table space.  This rulebook gets an A- on The Chair Test!!

IMG_4690

The game starts off great with a Table of Contents, a link for a Companion App, a link for a How to Play video, and a list of all components (most) with correlating pictures!!  Very very nice! I felt very happy to see this!  My only fix might be that I had wished they had labelled the tokens better … there are a lot of tokens and I didn’t know what any of them were!! 

IMG_4691

The set-up is pretty good, but this where the cracks start to develop.  This is my first example of this rulebook being too minimal: I accidentally shuffled the Summon deck, but it doesn’t say WHY you shouldn’t it!  I didn’t know how to recover?!?!??!  It turns out the Summon deck should “probably” just be alphabetically sorted so you can find cards easily … that’s the only reason to not shuffle it, you just make your life harder when you have to find a card.  Really, I could have used a sentence:

  “Don’t shuffle the Summon Deck because you will be searching for cards (alphabetically) in it later in the game.  Just sort the deck alphabetically if you accidentally shuffle it!

But other than that, the set-up went fairly well.  

IMG_4692

This rulebook is pretty well annotated with lots of pictures and examples.   See above.  In general, the rules are fairly clearly set out.  But the real problem with this rulebook is that it seems to assume that you have played the video game.  There are a lot of places where a rulebook for a normal game would be chastised.  I can’t tell you how many times I played with Jon and Keala (who have played the Video Game A LOT), and when I went to lookup a rule, they told me “it’s just like that in the video game!  So it probably means that!” So many times, they clarified a rule by saying “it’s like that in the video game!”  … which is not good for those of us who haven’t played the video game or other Rogue-Lites.

IMG_5328

My canonical example of this was the Regret curse.  I actually got two curses one one turn, Regret and Injury (see above)!  My reading of these was that Injury was a worse curse because it keeps clogging my deck as I draw it and shuffle it back in.  I though Regret was a better curse because you just got once and it was out of your deck.   Nope! It clogs your hand so you draw fewer cards!   You draw up to 5 cards, so if Regret is in your hand, you can only draw 4 cards.  I didn’t think the rule was well-specified in the rulebook, but when I asked Keala and Jon they said “Oh it’s just like the Video Game, you can only draw 4 cards!”.  I really wish the rules had made this clearer!  This is just one of SO MANY examples where Jon and Keala said “Oh it’s like that in the video game!”.  This rulebook should have been vetted by someone who has NOT played the video game so as to clarify a lot of finer points.

IMG_4701

Even though this game doesn’t have an Index (and it really should), the back of the rulebook had an invaluable list of Abilities and Keywords.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot of good stuff in the rulebook, but it was too minimal in a few places (For example: a few more sentences about the Retain keyword or why Summon deck shouldn’t be shuffled).  I was able to learn the game and playthrough solo … and I had fun. I was able to play cooperatively with a bunch of friends (who hadn’t played the Video Game) … and we all had fun.  It wasn’t until I played with seasoned Video Gamers that knew the game that I realized this rulebook needed some more clarifications: it depended a little too much of knowledge of the video game.

Solo Game

IMG_4788

Like the Video Game, you can play this solo (thank you for following Saunders’ Law)! See above as I set-up the red guy for a solo game. There’s not really a lot of special rules or exceptions for the solo game, you just play! The main balancing mechanisms are really in combat:

  1. In plain combat, a monster comes out per row (i.e. per player). Thus, the solo player will be fighting just one row of monster(s).
  2. In Big Bad combat, the number of hit points is scaled to the number of players.

So, in general, you can just jump in and play the solo game without any real special rules! Thank you Slay The Spire! It was SO EASY to jump in solo!

IMG_4846

I had so much fun playing solo that I played through the first three Acts of the game! I had a blast!  There are so many places where you upgrade or get new cards, that you always feel like you are making progress!  You always feel like you are getting better!

Really, solo was fun.  I had a blast. I played wrong on a few points (one to discuss below), but even without knowing the Video Game, I had a good time.

Cooperative Play with Players Who DO NOT Know the Video Game

IMG_4895

I ended up playing a full 4-Player game of Slay The Spire with three of my friends who have never played the Video Game!  We ended up playing through Act I in one night in about 90 minutes (with a little extra time for set-up and tear-down).   So, I just had to teach the game as-is … no one (including myself) had ever played Slay The Spire the Video Game!

IMG_4896

The biggest conceptually difference, of course, is that this is a fully cooperative game! Slay The Spire is always thought of as a solo game! But the board game is fully cooperative!

IMG_4898

The biggest change is that every character gets his/her own row of monsters to fight!  See above!  While you nominally tend to fight the monster in your row (it sort of becomes “your responsibility” as it does damage to you only), you can target any monster in any row!  So, if a monster has a particularly bad effect for everyone (certain monsters can attack everyone), or if a comrade just needs a little help, players may choose to work together to take out particularly vexing monsters! 

IMG_4903 

My favorite rule in this game is that it allows fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order (see more discussion of PSTO here).  The rulebook calls this out on page 12:

“Players can play cards, use potions, and activate abilities in any order they choose.”

What this means, is that we (as players) can intersperse our actions to accomplish things! If we need Sara to play a Potion, then Andrew attacks to add a Vulnerable, to which then Sara can play another card and attack (for double damage), we can do that! Players can work together to find the best combination of their interspersed actions to take down the baddies!

IMG_4897

In fact, in some ways, Slay The Spire gets the best of both worlds! Since you “generally” need to fight the monster in your row, players can do Simultaneous Actions to fight their own monster, but defer to fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order if they really need to! The Simultaneous Actions helps keep everyone involved … rather than waiting for “your turn”, you can all fight the monsters at once … this means there is much less downtime.

I think this is where Slay The Spire shines the brightest as a cooperative game: the players can choose the best way to play to either help each other (with fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order) or move the game along quickly (with an easy way to Simultaneous Actions fighting your monsters!) It’s the player’s choice, and I noticed we shifted between these modes pretty seamlessly when we played! It was something I didn’t notice until I looked back on our plays.

IMG_4901

The cooperative game worked fantastically, probably better than the solo game because I got to talk and strategize and have fun with my friends!

Cooperative Play With People WHO HAVE PLAYED The Video Game

IMG_5308

So, I wanted to make sure I played this game cooperatively with some friends who have played the video game: I wanted to see what they thought.   Jon and Keala (above) are both fans and have played (and like) Slay The Spire the video game.

IMG_5312

What happened sort of surprised me: we fell into a rhythm fairly quickly.  Every time there was any rules question, Jon or Keala spoke up and said “Well, it’s like this in the video game”, so we didn’t spend very much time pouring over the rulebook.  The Video Game became the reference implementation of the game!  This was both cool and annoying.  It was cool that the game seemed to fall inline with the Video Game, but it was annoying that the rulebook didn’t do better at explaining a lot of things.

IMG_5310

We had so much fun playing, we ended up playing Act I and Act II in one night!   The game just seemed fun to everyone.

IMG_5304

Jon saved our bacon a number of times: he had the ability to shield other players (as the blue guy), which worked out very well!  I would be able to attack something (as the red guy) and Jon (as the blue guy) would shield me or Keala (the green guy) so that we wouldn’t die!   This cooperation seemed seamless!  It just happened that way!   

IMG_5311

The game really clicked for everyone that night: I feel like I know the game better (with all my friends’ comments on how the Video Game works), and I was able to bring my friends into the card game quickly from reading the rules.  We had a great time and plan to play again!

A While

IMG_5313

It’s taken a while for me to get to this point.  I initially had some misgivings about the game.

At first, I was grumpy at the rulebook for how minimal is was: it really needs a lot more elaborations on the rules.  There was one rule in particular I was enchanted with, until I realized I was playing wrong. The “Draw 5 Cards: there is no maximum hand size” (p. 12) lead me to believe that maybe I had more choice of which cards I could discard.  Maybe I could keep cards between hands?   Why else would you emphasize this rule of no maximum hand size?  Jon and Keala had to tell me this, but you always discard all your cards!! All of them! … just like in the video game.   (to be fair, it is in the rulebook but it is one sentence).  I think that rule is there to show that during your turn you can draw as many cards as you want.  

IMG_5074

Another thing that threw me off for a while was the art. I had just gotten a new deck-building expansion for Thunderstone Quest (see art above), and the art and graphic design for Thunderstone Quest (above) is significantly better than the art for Slay The Spire (below).

IMG_4805

Comparatively, the art for Slay The Spire is a little anemic after looking at Thunderstone Quest. But I seem to be the only one who doesn’t love the art.  I will admit, the art for Slay The Spire has grown on me a little: it’s very simple and not too busy.  It’s also very readable.  But since I have never played the original video game, I was not as “enchanted” with this art as others.

Flaws

IMG_5314

This is a funny flaw in the game: you can’t (easily) have multiple games going on!  You can save your game fairly easily (putting the appropriate cards in the appropriate slots), so you know you can come back and do another session.  The problem is, if you want to play another game, you can to reset ALL THE CARDS for each deck!!  We worked around it by taking pictures of our decks: if worse comes to worse, we can always use the picture of all our cards (see above) to recreate our save game.   I suspect many people will want to try this game, and we won’t be able to easily have many games going on.  In some ways, this is a product of its own success: it’s so much fun, people want to try it!  But, be aware that a single game is easy to save, multiple games will require taking pictures of all your cards. And also the Unlocks sheet (see below) .. which presents more issues.

IMG_4799

Another problem with this game is it’s really unclear how you move on once you play through Acts I, II, and III.  The Ascension decks (see above) add some variety and keep the game interesting, but it’s kind of unclear how this fits in.  Do you start a new game at Act I with the changes?  Do you start a new deck?  To play Act IV, you have to unlock it, but are you playing Act III again and again and again?  Like everything I have seen in this rulebook, I wanted more elaboration!  This rulebook frustrates me!  Give me an example, give me a few more sentences, give me a page!  I have played a solo game all the way through Act III.  What do I do now?  Add Ascension cards? Start over at Act I?  This is very unclear!!!   This is probably my biggest ding against the game: I don’t know exactly how to move forward.  Sure, I suspect I will post to BoardGameGeek and someone will respond, and I will be able to move forward.  But this rulebook does not make it clear how to move forward after Act III. UPDATE: I had lunch with my friend who has played the Video Game.  He told me that in the Video Game, you just reset everything (including you deck) back to ACT I, but make a few cards (like the uncoloreds) available.  I really DID NOT get that sense from the rulebook … another instant where knowledge of the Video Game helped and the rulebook didn’t. 

Conclusion

IMG_5300

Honestly, this Slay The Spire board and card game has really grown on me: I have played it solo numerous times, and I have shown it to many diverse game groups. The more I play it, the more I seem to like it!  The upgrade paths makes this game great: there are so many opportunities to augment and upgrade your deck as you are playing!  The fact that each players is so distinct in both powers and upgrades really contributes to how great this game is!

IMG_5302

The production is fantastic, and the art is … thematic to the game.  I have grown to appreciate the simple art and graphic design, but I still think the art and graphic design is a little anemic.  

IMG_4758

The solo game is great: it’s about an 8.5/10.  It’s easy to play, and there’s really no exceptional rule changes needed to get the solo game to the table.   

IMG_4902

The cooperative game is about a 9/10: the base game is all there, with all the upgrade and augment paths, but the cooperation really shines brightly! Players can choose so many ways to help each other with fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order, with Simultaneous Play keeping everyone engaged at all times! And even though these play modes seem mutually exclusive, players seem to weave in and out of Simultaneous Play and PSTO without even noticing! 

IMG_5301

Players who know Slay The Spire the video game might find this to be a 10/10 for them: the game is great and also evokes so much atmosphere from the Video Game!  

Over the course of many  play sessions (both solo and cooperative), I ended up liking the game more and more.  There are some issues with the rulebook, as it seems to assume players know Slay The Spire Video Game pretty well! Other than my issues with the rulebook, the game is great.  Putting everything together, this feels like a 9.5/10 as an overall production!  This game surprised me how much I liked, especially given my anti-Rogue-lite tendencies.

Cooperative Hacking: A Review of Hacktivity

IMG_3734

Hacktivity was a game on Kickstarter back in June 2022: see link here.   This is a cooperative hand management game for 1-4 players.  It originally promised delivery in February 2023, but didn’t deliver to my house until late April 2024: this makes it over a year late!  

IMG_3737

I was originally a little concerned about this game because at some point there was a Kickstarter update saying they lost their manufacturer! I was worried that this meant we might never see the game, but the Hacktivity people persevered and did deliver final copy! I was actually quite impressed with their positive attitude and communication during the Kickstarter! I’ve had a number of Kickstarters recently with poor communication and it was nice to see someone owning every step of the process!

IMG_5181

Let’s take a look!

Unboxing and Gameplay

IMG_3740

This is a fairly standard sized box (“about” the size of  a Ticket to Ride sized box): see Coke can above for perspective.

IMG_5182

In this game, each player takes on the role of a special hacker. See the four decks above.

IMG_3786

Each hacker has their own board as well: see the boards above.

IMG_3777

Each hacker’s deck is different and has a different emphasis or/and special powers.  See two such decks above.

IMG_3780

The players are interacting with a board (see above) with three separate regions. Notice how nice the plastic components  of each region are! 

IMG_3807

This is a game about managing cards.  The purple cards are the virus cards that have bad effects … we’ll dub these the “bad news” cards.  The blue cards are the player cards that keep the bad news (the viruses) under control.  We’ll call the blue cards the “good news” cards. See above.

IMG_3821

The leftmost board (yellow) keeps track of activity: you move the leftmost yellow cube up as a “bad news” as the games plays.  If all yellow cubes make it to the top (see above), players lose!  

IMG_3810

The middle board (blue) is a place where you can “isolate” viruses that come out.  This isolation defers their effects and makes you deal with them later.

IMG_3811

The right-most red board keeps track of “the strange bug”: this is usually what you are trying to keep under control.  In the first game, you need to keep the “strange bug” in the white area to win.

IMG_5205

In order to win, players (usually) need to make it through all of the bad news cards (purple cards) and all of their own cards (blue) without losing! See above, a winning game!  All bad news (purple cards) are in the discard! And “the strange bug” was kept under control in the white zone!

IMG_5196

What’s interesting about this game is that every turn presents a lot of choices!  The first choice: how many bad news (purple) cards do you take and how many good news (your character cards) do you take?  See above as we choose two good news (ArTeMis) and one bad news (A1).  You have to work your way all the way through both decks eventually, so you can’t always take more good than bad! You have to balance that out!

IMG_5187

Once everyone chooses their cards, everybody flips and has to deal with their cards!

IMG_3806

Every card offers one of two choices.  For the bad news card above, you can choose the top or bottom: either isolate the virus on the blue board (notice the blue circle on the TOP CHOICE) with hope to destroy it later OR you can destroy it immediately, but pay the full cost on the bottom of the card.

But it’s a choice.

IMG_3805

The good news cards (your player cards) are also a choice: the top choice is usually a lesser choice, but with no side effects.  The bottom choice is usually more powerful, but with a bad side effect! On the card above, the upper choice is an attack of 2 on an isolated virus … but no side effect.  The bottom choice is a more powerful attack of 3, but having the side effect of raising the activity (the yellow board).  

IMG_5201

Players continue to play until they meet the winning conditions!  Usually, this means playing though all decks (bad news and good news decks) and keeping “the strange bug” under control!

IMG_3754

Given that the Kickstarter had to switch manufacturers halfway through, the game has really nice components!  My only major complaint is that I wish the cards were linen-finished: you do handle the cards a lot as you play.  But I liked the art and three-part board works well.

IMG_3760

Rulebook

IMG_3743

The rulebook is two-sided: one part is in French and the other in English! It’s much less daunting when you know it’s only 12 pages (with the other 12 pages being the French rules).

The game does pretty well on The Chair Test: The rulebook fits on the chair next to me pretty well.  The rulebook is a little bigger than I wanted, but it still stays open.  The font is a little thin and a little small, so it’s a little harder to read than it should, but it still works: this is about a B+ on The Chair Test.

IMG_3762

The components are well-labelled. See above.

IMG_3763

The Set-up (above) is pretty well documented: this set-up spans two opposite pages, so it’s easy to set-up by just leaving the rulebook open.

IMG_3765

The rules are generally pretty good and well notated.

IMG_3768

The biggest flaw is that there is no index (boo), but the last page of the book has a nice list of symbols.

IMG_3766

I was happy with this rulebook.  This rulebook was obviously a translation, but there were only a few places where that was readily apparent.

Solo Play

IMG_3738

So, the game does have a nice solo mode (thanks for following Saunders’ Law)! 

IMG_3799

The solo game is NOT playing two characters: basically, you combine the decks of two characters (see above as I play BLASSST!!! and ArTeMis!) and just play that one deck (setting up the rest of the game as if it were a 2-Player game).  I was worried about this solo mode at first … “Is this really different from the cooperative mode?”   And it’s really not.  You just have more cards to play through.   I am surprised I like this solo mode: I usually prefer playing two separate characters with two positions (see Leviathan Wilds from a few weeks ago), but this combined-deck solo-mode worked for me.  

IMG_5189

So, the solo game combines two decks and has the solo player become a “cyborg” of those characters (I am taking artistic license here).  See above.

IMG_5205

Interestingly, I played my first solo game when I got the game a while ago, but it took a while to interest my friends!  So I had to remind myself how to play with a few more solo games right before I taught them how to play.  I am happy to say that I enjoyed the solo mode more the more I played it.  It’s only a 40-60 minute game! It moves quickly!  And it was easy to remember how to set-up and play.

I liked Hacktivity solo and I liked the solo mode that came with it.

Cooperative Mode

IMG_5208

The cooperative mode was easy to teach.  The basic flow of the game is pretty simple once you get the idea.  

IMG_5210

I think the least favorite aspect of the cooperative game were the limits on communication.  Strictly speaking, you can’t say much about your hand: you can sort of hint about how much damage you can inflict,  and you can hint at stuff.   As we played, we kind of ended-up slowly moving around this restriction … because it wasn’t fun!  We play cooperative game because we want to talk and interact with our friends: we usually dislike cooperative games with limits on communication. 

IMG_5211

There are a lot of little icons in this game as well: that took a little to get our heads around, and the rulebook had to be passed around a little (see above).  After a while, the icons took hold and we could just play: it didn’t take too long (and the little player aid cards helped a lot).

IMG_5212

In general, the cooperative game went pretty well, but not great.  The real issue was the limit on communication.  And we get it: sometimes you need that restriction to keep the Alpha Player in check … but we ended up just going around the communication restrictions.

What I Liked

IMG_3817

The color-coding scheme worked very well.  The blue section of the board … gets affected by the blue markers.  The yellow part of the board … is affected by the yellow icons.  This was very clear and very well done.  This color coordination really helped move the game forwards, as it appealed to your intuition (“this color goes here”).

IMG_3807

The order in which you resolve your good news and bad news cards is players’ choice:  You can even intersperse your card resolutions between players!  You can do good news first, then bad news, or all at once!  It’s players’ choice!! This is fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order at its finest!!  This is where the cooperation shined (shone?) most in this game!  As a group, we had to figure out the order to resolve cards, and we felt clever when we could avoid certain bad news effects by playing these certain orders!  I really really liked how they used Player Selected Turn Order in Hacktivity! It really made the game feel that much more cooperative.

IMG_5190

Every card is a choice!  This is great! Every single cards has to be resolved, and you have a choice of whether to take the top or bottom option!  

IMG_5195

The game is easy to teach and play quickly. And it’s a pretty quick game at 40-60 minutes. 

IMG_3755

We didn’t get into it too much, but there is a campaign here if you want to pursue it.

What I Didn’t Like

IMG_5207

This is more of a missed opportunity than a dislke: the backs of the bad news card don’t mean anything (unless it’s a yellow activity card, which happens just a few times). See the A1 and A2 above? They mean nothing useful for gameplay: they only denote which player count decks you are using. Paleo did the wonderful thing (see our review here) of having the back of the cards be a “hint” as to what’s on the front of the card. The A1 and A2 on the backs of the cards above …. don’t really mean anything. They SHOULD give you a hint to “how hard” the bad news is, but they really don’t.

Since you are drawing bad news cards without knowing anything, it makes the game feel a little more random. How many Bad News cards should I draw? I don’t know … I don’t hav a sense of how hard each one is!!! I think a “hint” of some kind would make the game feel less random.

IMG_5212

The limited communication rules felt too constraining; they hampered our enjoyment of the game. The best combinations we played in the game where when we could keep the bad news cards from having any effect … and we could only do this if we were more sharing. This game needs an Open Hand rule:

“If you and your friends are comfortable with Open Hand, go ahead and play with all cards showing. Realize that Open Handed may make the game easier, invite analysis paralysis, and/or cause Alpha Players to take over the game.”

Really, this communication limit drop probably dropped by friend’s rating of the game: see below.

Conclusion

IMG_3823

I liked Hacktivity! I enjoyed all the choices in the game: choosing how many good news/bad news cards to choose, the order to resolve the cards (fine-grained Player Selected Turn Order), and the choices per card! All of this really made me feel like I was making choices that mattered as I played.

IMG_5208

I was be remiss if I didn’t include my friend’s opinions: I liked this more than them. I would give this a 7/10, and suggest we play Open Hand. My friend Teresa liked it ok (no rating), but Sara said “I would give it a 4/10: I liked it okay, but there’s a lot better games to play!” I don’t necessarily agree with her, but you may feel as she does. The main issues for Sara were the lack of Hints on the back of the bad new cards and the stifling of cooperation. The limited communication can be counteracted by playing Open Hand, but the lack of hints can make the bad news feel too random and I am not sure what we can do about that.

IMG_5204

I would be happy to teach this to you: I think Hacktivity is a quick and easy game to teach/learn and it promotes a lot of choice.  The solo game was fun and the cooperative game was fun once we added Open Hand.